Software Quality Intelligence™ brings the discipline of industrial measurement to software: a shared reference framework, objective metrics, a comparable score. Stop estimating quality. Start reading it.
The method doesn't rest on a tool: it's a three-step diagnostic flow. A targeted questionnaire frames your context; a call digs into it, answer by answer, after analyzing what you reported; a findings session turns it into concrete recommendations, on process as well as tooling.
We start from your reality — your answers — not from a predefined solution. The analysis framework draws on the TMMi® 2.0 maturity model; the measures to put in place follow from what the diagnostic reveals.
Maintenance accounts for most of a system's total cost over its lifetime. A modern car exceeds 100 million lines of code; soon, a billion. No one maintains the equivalent of hundreds of thousands of pages blindly.
Measuring risks and technical debt early — during development, not after go-live — means acting where every fix costs the least. That is the heart of Software Quality Intelligence™.
The four pillars follow on from one another. It all starts with reducing software risks: that is what enables control of technical debt — and controlled debt accelerates both compliance and deliveries.
It all starts here. We map the critical areas, silent failures, and recurring defect patterns before they reach the field or the release. Risk, invisible until now, becomes a prioritized list of actions.
Once risks are under control, debt stops being a gut feeling: quantified, located, prioritized. Effort focuses on the fraction of code that carries most of the risk, rather than rewriting everything.
Healthier, better-controlled code aligns more easily with regulatory requirements: audits and certifications become a given, not a last-minute scramble.
Less rework, fewer last-minute incidents, predictable releases — a time-to-market gain achieved without growing the team.
When the chain falls into place, the effects compound: fewer risks, debt under control, smoother compliance, and faster deliveries.
Caught upstream, before they reach the release.
Quantified and prioritized, no longer piling up in the shadows.
Audits and certifications approached as a given.
Reliable, predictable releases, without growing the team.
No leap of faith, no solution imposed in advance: you leave with a clear reading of your situation and what you need to decide your own improvement priorities.
A short pre-qualification questionnaire, sent beforehand, to frame your context: testing and coverage, static analysis and compliance, technical debt, security, governance. About ten questions, ten minutes. Filling it in is worth it in itself: a reading grid for your test process, to keep no matter what.
After analyzing your answers, a conversation that doesn't re-read the questionnaire but digs into it: for each point, how, who decides, what impact — until the gray areas surface.
A findings session that turns observations into measures to put in place, at your discretion: concrete process recommendations and, where the diagnostic warrants it, tooling. See the detailed flow.
Tools are never the starting point: they follow from the findings. Depending on what the diagnostic reveals, we may suggest the solutions presented on the Tools page, if they fit your case.
Thirty minutes to map your quality risks — risks, debt, compliance, visibility — and identify the measures to put in place.
